It's here!

What are People Saying?
"Today's home care workers are lumped into the same category as teenage baby sitters when it comes to how much they make. This is wrong and unfair. Receiving a fair wage will further stabilize and professionalize a critical line of work that is suffering from a shortage of workers."
Tom Perez,
Secretary of Labor
"Businesses will have trouble because customers won't be able to afford the care. In the end, the people who will be likely to suffer will be the workers who can't get the work they had before."
Marc Freedman
Executive Director for Labor Law Policy
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
"While intended to help caregivers, this rule will have the opposite effect. Home care companies will have little choice but to employ workers part-time rather than full-time as Medicaid payment rates and consumers with limited incomes cannot afford higher costs. Caregivers in the end will receive less pay."
Andrea Devoti
Chair
National Association for Home Care and Hospice
"The move will benefit the largely female, minority, and low-wage workers who provide these essential services."
Richard Trumka
President
AFL-CIO
"The Obama administration has made good on its promise to extend wage and overtime benefits to home care worker. It is important that agencies and states not make shortsighted changes to their programs that could reduce benefits or deprive consumer of the consistency of care they receive from their providers."
Mary Kay Henry
President
Service Employees International Union
While we are just beginning to review the 350+ page final regulation (and
supporting materials), our initial review indicates that the Labor Department
was not responsive to the majority of concerns raised by HCAOA or others in the
home care industry. For example, the final rule, like the proposed rule, states
that the companion care exemption may not be used by third party
employers.
The one bit of good news is that the rule’s effective date is January 1, 2015.
In addition, the delayed effective date gives us time to fully consider all of
our public policy options and determine how we can best help our members
understand the regulation and successfully navigate the new
requirements.
While we may not be pleased
with the new rule announced today, it is important to acknowledge that HCAOA,
its members, and our partners made an incredibly important contribution to the
public policy debate around this rule. We not only made this decision difficult
for policymakers, but our efforts are likely at least partially responsible for
the delayed effective date. In addition, we have sensitized policymakers to our
concerns and created relationships that could be helpful down the road. We want
to thank all of our members for their hard work in challenging the Labor
Department’s proposal."
Peter Ross
President, and
Gale Bohling
Legislative Chair
Home Care Association of America
The Final Regulation - all 358 pages - may be downloaded from the Labor Department's Web site.
The Final Regulation - all 358 pages - may be downloaded from the Labor Department's Web site.
What Does This Mean to YOU?
Owners of home care companies will be hit with a double whammy on January 1, 2015. First, you will need to pay overtime to your caregivers for more than 40 hours of work. Second, you will need to either purchase health care insurance for your caregivers or pay a penalty to the government under the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
In our view, these two new laws will have the following effects:
- Caregivers will make less money because they will not be able to work more than 40 hours for one employer
- More caregivers will have to work two jobs so they can work more than 40 hours
- Clients and families will have to pay more for home care services
- Home care companies will see increased costs of doing business. These include:
- Paying overtime
- Paying minimum wage and overtime for live-in caregivers
- Paying for health insurance or paying the penalty
- The increased cost of recruiting, selection, training, and retention of caregivers.
However, be assured that it's not the end of the world. A number of states already have laws which override the companionship exemption, and Massachusetts has required health insurance for several year. Home Care companies are resilient, and have managed to survive and prosper in those states. However, the hourly rates charged to clients are higher in those states than in other states.
We'll watch these developments closely and keep you informed on the best practices in the industry as you adapt to change.
Appreciate your encouragement at the end of this--we must adapt to these changes and continue, as employers, to strike the delicate balance of what is best for our clients and fair to our dedicated caregivers!
ReplyDeleteExpress Home Care pays our staff above the minimum wage scale. Where we will see the hit in the future is health care, as a non medical agency we are limited to the ways in which we can be paid. Thus making it hard for the client(s) to be cared for. The cost of helping one person per hour is about 25 hr. Express Home Care, however bills on what they an afford in some cases the ownership pays the out of pocket expense for the care.
ReplyDeleteIn PA we have had to pay overtime and minimum wage since 2006. There has not been any positive effect for the employees only negatives. The additional costs to our agency and our clients has affected raises and other benefits we used to be able to give our employees. Now we must keep employees at no more than 40 hours a week where they once worked as many hours as they wanted. That causes less continuity in care for clients and aides have to pick up part time jobs to make up the difference. The Labor Industry just doesn't understand home care.
ReplyDeleteI am thoroughly convinced in this said post.
ReplyDeleteElder Care Atlanta